中国循证儿科杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (2): 81-87.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5501.2024.02.001

• 论著 •    下一篇

《儿童静脉输液治疗临床实践循证指南》中静脉输液装置选择推荐意见的实施性研究

王颖雯1,2,张青青1,2,胡静1,孔梅婧1,顾莺1   

  1. 1 复旦大学附属儿科医院护理部上海,201102;2 共同第一作者

  • 收稿日期:2024-07-05 修回日期:2024-07-05 出版日期:2024-04-25 发布日期:2024-04-25
  • 通讯作者: 顾莺

Application of recommendations for venous access devices selection in hospitalized children from Clinical Practice Guideline on Infusion Therapy in Children: An implementation study

WANG Yingwen1,2, ZHANG Qingqing1,2, HU Jing1, KONG Meijing1, GU Ying1   

  1. 1 Nursing Department, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 201102,China; 2 Co-first author
  • Received:2024-07-05 Revised:2024-07-05 Online:2024-04-25 Published:2024-04-25
  • Contact: GU Ying, email: guying0128@aliyun.com

摘要: 背景:实施性研究是指系统地将循证实践纳入到临床工作中,提高卫生服务质量和有效性,弥补证据与临床实践的鸿沟的一类研究,但目前针对指南推荐意见的实施性研究受到的关注不多。 目的:基于《儿童静脉输液治疗临床实践循证指南》(简称指南)中住院患儿静脉输液装置(VAD)选择的推荐意见制定实施策略,评价证据的实施对患儿相关结局、医护人员的循证实践行为及医院组织环境的改变,以期发现不同临床情景推荐意见与临床实践的冲突。 设计:实施科学研究。 方法:在复旦大学附属儿科医院,从4个层面(传播策略、实施过程策略、整合策略、能力建设策略)制定促进证据实施的策略和相应的个体化行动方案,并应用于输液治疗中VAD选择环节。基于REAIM框架,从覆盖人群、干预的效果、机构内采用情况和干预的实施4个维度评价实施过程和实施效果。 主要结局指标:VAD选择错误率、护士VAD选择行为依从性。 结果:实施时间为2022年5月30日至10月30日,干预组患儿2 343例次,对照组患儿2 309例次。(1)覆盖人群维度:实施期间符合纳入和排除标准的患儿4 652例次,接受实施策略和个体化行动方案的患儿2 343例次。(2)干预效果维度:两组患儿性别差异无统计学意义,但年龄、是否急诊入院、是否手术和科别差异均有统计学意义。调整了年龄、是否急诊入院、是否手术和科别后,与对照组相比,干预组VAD选择的错误率降低了26%(OR=0.745,95%CI:0.612~0.906);对照组较干预组静脉外渗/渗出发生率差异无统计学意义(OR=1.070,95%CI:0.822~1.393);护士VAD选择的知识水平,干预组(83.9±12.4)高于对照组(56.0±13.1),差异有统计学意义。依从性5条审查指标在实施前、中、后的依从性均为100%,4条审查指标在实施前、中、后的依从性显著提升,7条审查指标在实施前、中、后的依从性差异无统计学意义。(3)机构内采用情况维度:实施期间,整群随机抽样的10个病区(100%)全程参与了策略实施;并采纳了指南中所有17条证据(100%);共设置多轮4个学时的理论培训和3个学时的操作培训以促进护士了解实施策略和行动方案,214名护士(100%)全部完成培训课程。(4)干预实施维度:本研究制定的6条实施策略完成率为83.3%;干预前后外周静脉导管(PIVC)输液耗材成本效应为2.1>0,提示干预后可以节约成本。 结论:对指南推荐意见基于REAIM框架的覆盖人群、干预的效果、机构内采用情况和干预实施4个维度的过程评估良好,但干预效果中的护士VAD选择行为依从性评估一般。

关键词: 儿童, 静脉输液, 输液装置选择, 实施性研究

Abstract: Background:Implementation research refers to systematically integrating evidencebased practice into clinical scenarios to improve the quality and effectiveness of healthcare services and bridge the gap between evidence and clinical practice. However, this type of research has not received much attention. Objective:To develop implementation strategies of the recommendations for venous access devices (VADs) selection in hospitalized children from Clinical Practice Guideline on Infusion Therapy in Children, to evaluate the impact of evidence implementation on patient outcomes, the evidencebased practice behaviors of healthcare workers, and organization environment changes in the hospital, and to identify conflicts between recommendations and clinical practice in different clinical settings. Design:Implementation study. Methods:We developed strategies to promote evidence implementation at Children's Hospital of Fudan University from four perspectives: dissemination, implementation process, integration, and capacity building. These strategies, along with correspongding individualized action plans, were applied in the VAD selection for children's infusion therapy. The implementation process and outcomes were evaluated from four aspects: reach, effectiveness (or efficacy), adoption, and implementation according to the REAIM framework. Main outcome measures:VAD selection error rate, and compliance of VAD selection among nurses. Results:The implementation period was from May 30, 2022, to October 30, 2022. We enrolled 2,343 patients in the intervention group and 2,309 patients in the control group. (1)Reach: During the implementation period, 4, 652 pediatric patients met the inclusion criteria. Out of these, 2, 343 patients received the implementation strategy and individualized action plan. (2) Effectiveness: Among the hospitalized children in the 10 wards, there was no statistically significant gender difference between the two groups. However, there were significant differences in patient age, emergency admission status, surgical status, and department. After adjusting for age, emergency admission status, surgical status, and department, compared to the control group, the intervention group had a 25% reduction in VAD selection error rate (OR=0.745, 95%CI: 0.6120.906). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of extravasation/infiltration between the control and intervention groups (OR=1.070, 95%CI: 0.8221.393). The nurses' knowledge level in VAD selection was significantly higher in the intervention group (83.9±12.4) compared to that of the control group (56.0±13.1). Compliance rate of five audit indicators was 100% before, during, and after implementation, compliance rate of four indicators significantly improved before, during, and after implementation, compliance rate of seven indicators showed no statistically significant difference before, during, and after implementation. (3) Adoption: During the implementation period, all 10 wards selected by cluster random sampling (100%) fully participated in the strategy implementation and adopted all 17 pieces of evidence (100%). Multiple rounds of course training (4 hours each) and practical training (3 hours each) were conducted to help nurses understand the implementation strategies and action plans, and all 214 nurses (100%) completed the training courses. (4) Implementation: The study developed six implementation strategies, achieving an 83.3% completion rate. The costeffectiveness index of peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) infusion materials before and after the intervention was 2.1>0, indicating that the intervention led to cost savings. Conclusion:The process evaluation of the guideline recommendations indicated a positive result across the four domains of reach, effectiveness (or efficacy), adoption, and implementation based on the REAIM framework. However, a moderate result was indentified in the compliance evaluation of nurses' VAD selection behavior in the effectiveness domain.

Key words: Children, Infusion therapy, Selection of venous access devices, Implementation evaluation